Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

The explosive growth of artificial intelligence has created unprecedented challenges for patent protection. While AI may be "the most...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-12-19-39-00-222-6914e254d13d736fb03da927.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-16-18-07-35-271-69419fe75657195f59083dcf.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-11-16-31-45-899-693af1f14973e04fad146697.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-02-20-10-02-704-692f479ade03c50ed481c865.jpg)