Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

The Bottom Line: The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the implementation of the American AI Exports Program, initiating a Call...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-03-18-15-07-00-857-69babf946e5ce452ac18d8ae.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-03-26-16-51-01-780-69c563f5f760ca3e00a3c85d.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-03-24-18-48-19-948-69c2dc73ca037df9e9650b3e.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-03-20-15-00-59-590-69bd612b7b5d794b2464ba37.png)