Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

Introduction The global aviation leasing and finance market continues to navigate an era of unprecedented geopolitical risk. The ongoing...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-14-21-54-05-920-69deb77d39776dfb16608f44.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-15-16-50-35-571-6a302d5b705a1110f2c5db00.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-12-21-14-01-258-6a2c7699683001d3aea02b7c.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-02-21-31-04-246-6a1f4b98d61661380aae5f41.jpg)