Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

Companies looking for federal investments in energy infrastructure and critical minerals, materials, and mining finally have an...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-08-12-21-32-53-009-6a7ce685041f696e4cb27312.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-08-31-02-23-38-311-6a94e5aa7f78a11931bf47f1.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-08-26-18-37-55-364-6a8f3283c72b005d21f9bafe.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-08-14-16-39-04-681-6a7f44a8822686ac0265e2c9.jpg)