Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

Geopolitical fractures and trade uncertainty persisted in 2025, yet cross‑border energy trade proved more essential than ever to global...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-09-19-56-21-177-69387ee52b43241fe164114d.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-01-10-19-37-26-134-6962aa76ed0bb291499e82c9.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-01-15-01-49-40-491-696847b4795a8a75bc6a99f3.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-01-12-20-41-36-360-69655c80ab784af100f41dd9.jpeg)