Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) officially updated its “Covered List” to ban new foreign-produced connected power inverters...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-07-29-19-19-14-239-6a6a52327b233ab23d6353e5.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-08-12-21-32-53-009-6a7ce685041f696e4cb27312.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-07-21-21-25-19-139-6a5fe3bf060832d50d87820e.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-07-02-16-23-42-591-6a46908ef9386209bf871e48.jpg)