Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

“Project Vault” is a first of its kind $12 billion strategic stockpile for critical minerals. By pairing Export-Import Bank financing...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-02-02-21-18-57-605-698114c11a718361944c5d25.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-02-12-23-04-41-712-698e5c895f26130ee7edcf8c.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-02-12-22-58-19-081-698e5b0bfb33fd3b34943187.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-02-11-17-01-39-882-698cb5f3d62dde2adf607628.jpeg)