Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

The Baker Botts Houston Board of Directors Forum, in partnership with the National Association of Corporate Directors, brought together...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-14-21-54-05-920-69deb77d39776dfb16608f44.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-14-00-25-22-852-69dd89726d7258fe4b93765a.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-01-17-30-36-836-69cd563c705f46f2d4c6a34e.jpg)