Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

Introduction The global aviation leasing and finance market continues to navigate an era of unprecedented geopolitical risk. The ongoing...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-14-21-54-05-920-69deb77d39776dfb16608f44.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-12-16-58-28-372-6a035c34595703a9397bcd8e.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-12-14-41-41-033-6a033c25a64fe1f399ef2ec5.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-11-18-29-58-477-6a0220267d16da5201df7afe.jpg)