Kadrey v. Meta! On the merits! A doozy of a summary judgment opinion in form and substance. "The devil is in the details," but even for non-lawyers, at least the first five pages are a must-read - there are almost no legal citations to bog you down. The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law. Why? According to the Court, the plaintiffs didn't do a good enough job explaining how Meta's use of their books to train Llama harmed the market for those works. So much more here to unpack...stay tuned!
| less than a minute read
Kadrey v. Meta - Fair Use as a Matter of Law
The Court's take is that while "in many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission," it wasn't here: using these thirteen plaintiffs' books was fair use as a matter of law.

The European Commission (“Commission”) published on 14 October 2026 its decision of 27 April 2026 clearing Airbus/Air France JV...
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-10-22-10-14-57-928-6ad9e221ce5decc884bf8c0a.png)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-10-20-18-37-38-700-6ad7b4f2467d3e8f034bc0f4.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-10-20-03-00-20-674-6ad6d9446b3e1917a7cb4cc7.jpg)
/Passle/678abaae4818a4de3a652a62/SearchServiceImages/2026-09-24-16-08-28-399-6ab54afc480f2289e9a3c3e1.jpg)